Methodology

How decaffeinate is built

decaffeinate is a working dataset of 55 specialty decaf coffees from 107 UK roasters, with editorial layered on top. This page sets out how the directory is compiled, how coffees are classified, how descriptions are produced, and how often the data is reviewed.

Last reviewed: 13 May 2026 Companion: editorial standards

What gets listed

The directory tries to include every specialty decaf coffee available to UK buyers. The four conditions for inclusion:

If a coffee meets these conditions, it goes in. We don't curate by taste. We don't filter by roaster size or fame.

How a coffee is classified

For every coffee on decaffeinate, we capture a consistent set of attributes from public sources (the roaster's website, the product listing, or the supplier where stated):

Fields that cannot be verified from public sources are left blank rather than guessed. If a roaster lists a coffee as "decaf" without naming the method, the method field is recorded as Unknown.

The decaf method classification

Decaf coffee is produced by one of a small number of industrial processes. decaffeinate classifies each coffee under one of these:

Method classification is based on what the roaster states publicly. Where a roaster names a specific branded process, we use that label. Where they describe the process generically, we map to the closest category and note the source.

How descriptions are written

Each coffee on decaffeinate carries a short description. The drafting process for every one:

Descriptions are written individually, not generated from a template. We don't lift marketing copy. We do quote roaster-supplied tasting notes when they are useful; quoted text is attributed inline.

How "best of" lists are built

A small number of pages on decaffeinate involve editorial ranking, not just structural ordering. These are the curated guides ("Best UK decaf coffee", "Best supermarket decaf") and any list with "best" in the title.

For these, the page shows the criteria, the weighting, and what we excluded. The standard layout includes a front-loaded answer, the explicit criteria, what we excluded and why, and an author byline with a last-updated date.

Where a featured coffee is also linked via an affiliate relationship, the page declares the affiliate status in line. The affiliate side is never the reason a coffee appears.

How often the data is updated

Three review cadences.

Continuous. When a reader, a roaster, or a search anomaly flags something, we check it and update if needed. Most updates land within a week.

Quarterly. Every quarter, we sweep for coffees that have been discontinued, rebranded, or moved between roasters, plus any method or origin changes the roaster has declared.

Annually. Once a year, we audit the full dataset. Every active coffee is checked against its current product page; any stale entry is marked inactive or updated.

What decaffeinate is not

decaffeinate is a directory and an editorial layer, not a shop or a tasting platform. We don't sell coffee, take orders, or run subscriptions. We don't operate paid placements for roasters. We don't host user reviews. Suggestions and corrections come through email and are processed manually.

What we don't claim to be

Three honest limits.

We haven't tasted every coffee. Descriptions cover origin, method, processing, and roaster context. They are not tasting reviews. Sensory notes, where present, are attributed to the roaster.

We don't certify methods. When we record a coffee as Swiss Water or Sugar Cane EA, we are reporting what the roaster has declared, not independently verifying it.

We're not exhaustive yet. The UK specialty decaf scene moves. New coffees launch every week, others quietly disappear. If you know one we've missed, email [email protected].

Spotted an issue with how a coffee is described, classified, or scored? The corrections page is the fastest way to flag it.

This page is reviewed at least once a year and updated whenever the methodology meaningfully changes.